Practical guide to the Idea, Development and Exploration stages of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations

Now available – our guide to identifying and using the pre-RCT stages of IDEAL

Early View Article in British Journal of Surgery

Br J Surg. 2016 Feb 10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10115. [Epub ahead of print]

Practical guide to the Idea, Development and Exploration stages of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations.

Pennell CP1, Hirst AD2, Campbell WB3, Sood A4, Agha RA5, Barkun JS6, McCulloch P2
1Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York. 2IDEAL Collaboration, Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, UK. 3Interventional Procedures and Medical Technologies Advisory Committees, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK. 4Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 5Department of Plastic Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 6Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital., Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Evaluation of new surgical procedures is a complex process challenged by evolution of technique, operator learning curves, the possibility of variable procedural quality, and strong treatment preferences among patients and clinicians. Preliminary studies that address these issues are needed to prepare for a successful randomized trial. The IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up) Framework and Recommendations provide an integrated step-by-step evaluation pathway that can help investigators achieve this.

METHODS:

A practical guide was developed for investigators evaluating new surgical interventions in the earlier phases before a randomized trial (corresponding to stages 1, 2a and 2b of the IDEAL Framework). The examples and practical tips included were chosen and agreed upon by consensus among authors with experience either in designing and conducting IDEAL format studies, or in helping others to design such studies. They address the most common challenges encountered by authors attempting to follow the IDEAL Recommendations.

RESULTS:

A decision aid has been created to help identify the IDEAL stage of an innovation from literature reports, with advice on how to design and report the IDEAL study formats discussed, along with the ethical and scientific rationale for specific recommendations.

CONCLUSION:

The guide helps readers and researchers to understand and implement the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations to improve the quality of evidence supporting surgical innovation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *